3 ms·
And the one for coronary disease? What do you find for that one? How about all the other studies positively linking coffee to diseases? I admit your assessment
by fractionalhare 6y ago
And the one for coronary disease? What do you find for that one? How about all the other studies positively linking coffee to diseases? I admit your assessment of the Parkinson's study is correct, but that doesn't really detract from my overall point. You moved the goalposts by changing the bar to all-cause mortality. I think my broader point stands.
- deeviant 6y ago> And the one for coronary disease? "Total coffee consumption was not associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease or stroke." Are you even trying here? > but that doesn't really detract from my overall point Would anything? It is looking to me that, in your mind, nothing would detract from your overall point. That, to your self, your ideas are inviolate. Which is my overall point, and which our continued discussion has only strengthened. > all-cause mortality My very first comment referenced all-cause mortality, and I have be consistent this entire time. It's quite O.K. to have goal posts, and I haven't moved them at all. > I think my broader point stands. I'll take "I'm right because I say I'm right even though I'm wrong for $1000 Alex". I mean you didn't even blink when your link that you provided supported my point rather than yours? I don't get how you didn't pause for even a second to think "What if I'm the one wrong here?".