7 ms·

Miro 4, the open source music and video player, is released

129 points by 16BitTons 15y ago

rawsyntax 15y ago
It's not an iTunes replacement at all. I have an iPhone and buy apps through iTunes sometimes. This doesn't have that functionality (nor the syncing with the iPhone). Also, it has a bittorrent client built in... Why?
- Blarat 15y ago
  So you can help out with bandwidth when downloading media (TED talks for example). Back when I used miro that was what I used it for at least.
- Argorak 15y ago
  Because Miro is the client for a video publishing platform that allows content providers to publish video streams to miro using rss and then have miro distribute it via bittorrent. Users are then able to search the Miro catalog and subscribe to those feeds if they are interested. For video-podcast addicts, thats really great. Its not a tacked on feature, this is actually the core feature of Miro - its a distributed video player/content provider. Not an iTunes replacement at all.
  - Periodic 15y ago
    This makes that BitTorrent client really make sense. Distributing video podcasts really has to be done via YouTube or not at all for a lot of people because it's such a pain to distribute the video due to bandwidth costs. BitTorrent helps, but many people aren't savvy with BitTorrent or are freaked out by piracy concerns. I'm a huge proponent of more legitimate BitTorrent usage. It really is a good distribution protocol.
bruce511 15y ago
Ok, so it's billed (here at least) as the "iTunes Replacement". And it advertises strongly "Converts and syncs to Android" (front and centre on the main page). But I'm really unclear if it'll actually replace iTunes for my iPod Touch. It doesn't say anything about i devices that I can see (except for advertising an iPad app that doesn't seem to be available yet.) So either; a) it doesn't sync my iOS devices in which case it may be a great media player, but it's not an iTunes replacement or b) They're hoping I'll take a huge amount for granted. My guess is that the heading in Hacker News is the bit that's completely misleading and I do wish folk wouldn't editorialize the headline. If it _is_ an iTunes replacement then a lot more info is needed - like will it sync my apps? Can I purchase new apps? and so on.
- Goronmon 15y ago
  From their FAQ: Can I sync my videos to an iPod or other video device? Currently, Miro doesn't directly sync with any portable devices. However, we will be working on this in future versions. In the meantime, you may be able to sync the video files themselves with a separate program.
  - deleted 15y ago
    [deleted]
- chaosfox 15y ago
  Yea, I felt the same, I only use iTunes today to sync with my iPod and this answer our question(http://www.getmiro.com/using-miro/faq/index.php#q3.7 http://www.getmiro.com/using-miro/faq/index.php#q3.7), it seems to download torrents though, "why" is my new question..
  - woadwarrior01 15y ago
    I used to use Miro, just to download torrents, about a year ago. My use case was to watch Ted Talks. You can search for RSS feeds from within it and once subscribed, select what items it downloads from within a feed. Once a video is watched, It'd be auto-deleted a week later, unless the user decides to keep it. It was actually pretty good. Eventually I ran out of hard disk space and decided to delete all the videos and uninstall Miro.
tmcw 15y ago
Miro's a very cool project - the Participatory Culture Foundation does a bang-up job of productizing what they do and making it pretty. For someone who'd want to switch from iTunes for higher performance and simplicity, rather than just going for an equivalent, what would I do?
- Brashman 15y ago
  I've switched to using foobar2000 (http://www.foobar2000.org/ http://www.foobar2000.org/) and I think it's the first music player that I actually like. It's extremely simple and I've found it quite fast and responsive, even on my netbook.
  - jokermatt999 15y ago
    I'd also strongly recommend foobar2000. It's incredibly fast, automatically adds music pretty much as soon as it's in the directory, is extremely customizable, and can look really, really nice. It has customizable global hotkeys, addon support, but works well out of the box. If any one is still trying to use iTunes on Windows, I strongly urge you to at least try foobar2000. Once I switched, there was just no way I was going back to iTunes. It alleviates so many of the stupid daily annoyances I had with iTunes.
  - tmcw 15y ago
    Er, I should have specified "on a Mac." Foobar is Windows-only AFAIK.
- ra 15y ago
  Try Banshee
- Tomek_ 15y ago
  If you're in the one of lucky countries (or have credit card from one of them) I'd suggest Spotify, their client is marvelous (the best UI for a music player ever and also very fast), supports playing local files and since last version also syncing with Apple devices (maybe some others too, haven't had occasion to check).
yankcrime 15y ago
I'd have hoped that an 'iTunes replacement' would be one that's somewhat less bloaty. I don't see Miro filling that gap, given it includes such nonsense as a BitTorrent client.
- Argorak 15y ago
  Which is actually the greatest feature of Miro. There are a lot of interesting feeds flying around the Miro bittorrent network. For example all confreaks conference videos.
  - callahad 15y ago
    Isn't that how Miro started life? As a video player that used torrents for distribution, and RSS feeds for discovery? In that light, the inclusion of a BitTorrent client is less surprising.
    - Argorak 15y ago
      Yes, exactly. And it actually works and is used.
SwellJoe 15y ago
I wish media player developers would stop trying to imitate iTunes. I hate iTunes. It's confusing (it's caused me to delete my entire music collection on my PC on multiple occasions), it's huge and demanding (of my focus/attention, and also computing resources) where it shouldn't be, and its integration with iTunes store is pointless and annoying to me (I don't shop at iTunes). It's great that seemingly high quality cross-platform tools like this are being developed, though I wonder what this does that Songbird (the last big "iTunes replacement" I can think of) does not?
- sigzero 15y ago
  "It's confusing (it's caused me to delete my entire music collection on my PC on multiple occasions)" What? Ummmm....even my super non-techie wife hasn't done that.
  - SwellJoe 15y ago
    I'm Appletarded, and get confused by a lot of Apple software. I don't know how I did it, but it's happened on three separate occasions. Twice on a Windows PC and once on a Mac. Somehow my misunderstanding of the sync feature led to the PC getting what was on the iPod, and the music collection on the PC being deleted. It was many years ago; I eventually learned my lesson and stopped trying to use the damned thing. Maybe it's better/safer now. But, I'll never find out, as I can't think of any reason I'd have to use iTunes.
    - thought_alarm 15y ago
      Syncing your iPod will never delete music from your PC. It is and has always been a one-way sync, PC to iPod, as far as music content is concerned.
      - Tyrannosaurs 15y ago
        Not quite true (music purchased on the iPod will be synced back) but near enough. pedant face
beza1e1 15y ago
Miro is a great application, but i would not call it an "iTunes replacement". I use it as a "video feed reader".
vetler 15y ago
The first thing that struck me was how visually identical to iTunes it was. Considering how Apple sued Samsung over UI similarity, I wouldn't be surprised if Miro could run into similar problems.
runjake 15y ago
"Replacement" is a bit too tough a word. It doesn't sync with (Apple) mobile devices, the primary reason I stick with iTunes. It also seems more sluggish and bloated than iTunes on my MBP i7 running 10.6. Seems like it was released way too prematurely. They could have spent more time building features & polish and utilized their launch hype much better. Sorting through all the marketing fluff, what are the true advantages of Miro?
- deleted 15y ago
  [deleted]
jz 15y ago
Looks interesting, however I really dislike iTunes' "everything under then sun" motto. If you are looking for something much more lightweight for playing music, check out mpd http://mpd.wikia.com/wiki/Music_Player_Daemon_Wiki http://mpd.wikia.com/wiki/Music_Player_Daemon_Wiki . There is a really nice Mac mpd client called Theremin: http://theremin.sigterm.eu/ http://theremin.sigterm.eu/
- aidenn0 15y ago
  Thanks for the link. I've been using qmpd on the mac with a lot of success for some time now, but I'll check out the native solution.
vaporstun 15y ago
Horribly annoying that on their website, when I click play on a video then close the popup, the video keeps playing! I tried to view a few clips and they were all playing in the background. Had to re-open the video again and manually press the pause button to stop them. Otherwise, it looks very similar to DoubleTwist but with the addition of syncing iOS devices. Wish it could drop some of the bloat (for example the torrent client) to make it more compelling. It is very tough though to make things more simplified. I know everyone has their gripes with iTunes, but it is very tough to have an interface that is complex enough to combine local management of music, management of apps, music, and videos on a device, a store and still allow the user the power to make decisions about individual songs, etc. I think Apple should diverge them and have the device syncing component as a separate program entirely, but tightly integrated so it can nab playlists, podcasts, etc. from iTunes. I hear iTunes is horrible on Windows, but on Mac it's not too bad and I can't think of many ways they could really optimize it without stripping features that would piss off a lot of users.
uast23 15y ago
Oh I just read the heading 'iTunes replacement', installed it and plugged in my iPhone to see how it behaves; and ta-da nothing happens! My mistake that I did not read the features, but whatever, why do we want to call it an iTunes replacement when it can't even sync
StuffMaster 15y ago
That website makes me not want their software.
- olalonde 15y ago
  You obviously don't visit much open source software websites. I thought this one wasn't bad at all compared to what I'm used to.
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]
- callahad 15y ago
  The text actually says "Ben's Phone". I suspect it's an Android device, with which syncing is supported.
antihero 15y ago
How does it handle large (+50,000 files) collections? Also: Oh no, it does that homepage spammy feeling option in the installer thing. This instantly makes me not want to donate, tbh, as it just feels scummy.
NHQ 15y ago
an "open" media player that is trying to eat Apples crumbs and wants independents to join in should have some kind of decentralized market for producers and publishers.
lurker19 15y ago
But can it play files over DAAP? That is the (my) holy grail for Mac music. Songbird sort-of can, in a buggy crashy way. Nothing else U have
lurker19 15y ago
But can it play files over DAAP? That is the (my) holy grail for Mac music. Songbird sort-of can, in a buggy crashy way. Nothing else I have tried (Banshee, Amarok, Rhythmbox, firefly player jar) compiles and loads and runs an plays on Mac.
- firethief 15y ago
  Yeah, it has DAAP support.
kodisha 15y ago
on mac (MBP laptop): - it doesn't react on previous/play/next buttons on keyboard - no last.fm integration
cormullion 15y ago
I know iTunes isn't very popular with HN readers, so I'll balance things out a bit and play devil's advocate for a while: I like iTunes quite a bit. There are certainly some minor gripes and irritations, particularly with the UI, but overall I'm satisfied with the performance of iTunes and wouldn't want to replace it without much careful thought. I'm not a computer power user, more of a 'system dadmin'; we run iTunes in the house on about six (Mac) computers and half a dozen or so devices. iTunes runs happily on all the computers, ranging from an old original iMac from 2001 (which runs Tiger and iTunes 8 and acts as an internet radio and music 'terminal') to an eMac from 2005 running Leopard and iTunes 10) and various Snow Leopard machines and attached drives. The different copies of iTunes copes with various libraries (the biggest one is 110GB) with apparent ease, and keeps track of the settings on various iPods, including a 60GB classic from 2005, two iPhones, three iPod Touches and a couple of Shuffles. It's easy to play music from other machines around the house - click on the computer's name and start listening to its music. It's also nice that when one of my children, say, buys an app for their iPhone on their iTunes Store account it appears automatically on mine too; similarly if I put music on mine it appears in their library, but of course you can be more selective in what you copy from family members' accounts and machines... I love the power of iTunes playlists - those heavy duty database-query-like nested multiple smart playlists - and it's a great way to control what gets put onto your iPod while it charges and you sleep. I also like: the automatic downloading of the latest podcasts and TV episodes; adding PDFs to my library puts them on my iPhone; broadcasting music around the house using iTunes DJ mode and Rogue Amoeba's Airfoil - controlling the music from any room using the Remote iPhone app (and sometimes letting people select music from their iOS devices); browsing the iTunes University and downloading lectures; tracking my App store spending with Wetfish Software's App Store Expense Monitor; writing new visualizers with Quartz Composer (which is cool if weird); ripping CDs with automatic track naming. I could go on. OK, I'll accept that iTunes is a bizarre behemoth of an application, and has certainly outgrown its moniker. But, for day to day use, people like me find it a solid and reliable media and device 'engine' that doesn't require much thought or effort to use effectively. But don't get me started on those stupid scrolling boxes within boxes... Edit: when I started typing this, I was sure the title said 'Miro 4 ... iTunes replacement ...'. When I finished typing, it didn't. (I went off to work between those two times.) So I was thinking about whether Miro could replace more than 10% of iTunes' functionality. This comment seems less relevant now.
udoprog 15y ago
The hackers solution. A media server running mpd or XMMS2, with the proper metadata organizing utility for your medialib. Plus running mplayer and possibly some ffmpeg tweaking for when you're out in the deep end. Plays anything, anywhere, and leaves the rest up to your imagination. I guess Miro is great, but any complete solution will always be inferior to the proper tools for the right jobs.
olalonde 15y ago
I've been a long time user of VLC media player and unsure if it'd be worthwhile to make the switch. Did anyone transition from VLC to Miro?

129 points by 16BitTons 15y ago

It's not an iTunes replacement at all. I have an iPhone and buy apps through iTunes sometimes. This doesn't have that functionality (nor the syncing with the iPhone). Also, it has a bittorrent client built in... Why?

Blarat 15y ago
So you can help out with bandwidth when downloading media (TED talks for example). Back when I used miro that was what I used it for at least.
Argorak 15y ago
Because Miro is the client for a video publishing platform that allows content providers to publish video streams to miro using rss and then have miro distribute it via bittorrent. Users are then able to search the Miro catalog and subscribe to those feeds if they are interested. For video-podcast addicts, thats really great. Its not a tacked on feature, this is actually the core feature of Miro - its a distributed video player/content provider. Not an iTunes replacement at all.
- Periodic 15y ago
  This makes that BitTorrent client really make sense. Distributing video podcasts really has to be done via YouTube or not at all for a lot of people because it's such a pain to distribute the video due to bandwidth costs. BitTorrent helps, but many people aren't savvy with BitTorrent or are freaked out by piracy concerns. I'm a huge proponent of more legitimate BitTorrent usage. It really is a good distribution protocol.

bruce511 15y ago

Ok, so it's billed (here at least) as the "iTunes Replacement". And it advertises strongly "Converts and syncs to Android" (front and centre on the main page). But I'm really unclear if it'll actually replace iTunes for my iPod Touch. It doesn't say anything about i devices that I can see (except for advertising an iPad app that doesn't seem to be available yet.) So either; a) it doesn't sync my iOS devices in which case it may be a great media player, but it's not an iTunes replacement or b) They're hoping I'll take a huge amount for granted. My guess is that the heading in Hacker News is the bit that's completely misleading and I do wish folk wouldn't editorialize the headline. If it _is_ an iTunes replacement then a lot more info is needed - like will it sync my apps? Can I purchase new apps? and so on.

Goronmon 15y ago
From their FAQ: Can I sync my videos to an iPod or other video device? Currently, Miro doesn't directly sync with any portable devices. However, we will be working on this in future versions. In the meantime, you may be able to sync the video files themselves with a separate program.
- deleted 15y ago
  [deleted]
chaosfox 15y ago
Yea, I felt the same, I only use iTunes today to sync with my iPod and this answer our question(http://www.getmiro.com/using-miro/faq/index.php#q3.7 http://www.getmiro.com/using-miro/faq/index.php#q3.7), it seems to download torrents though, "why" is my new question..
- woadwarrior01 15y ago
  I used to use Miro, just to download torrents, about a year ago. My use case was to watch Ted Talks. You can search for RSS feeds from within it and once subscribed, select what items it downloads from within a feed. Once a video is watched, It'd be auto-deleted a week later, unless the user decides to keep it. It was actually pretty good. Eventually I ran out of hard disk space and decided to delete all the videos and uninstall Miro.

tmcw 15y ago

Miro's a very cool project - the Participatory Culture Foundation does a bang-up job of productizing what they do and making it pretty. For someone who'd want to switch from iTunes for higher performance and simplicity, rather than just going for an equivalent, what would I do?

Brashman 15y ago
I've switched to using foobar2000 (http://www.foobar2000.org/ http://www.foobar2000.org/) and I think it's the first music player that I actually like. It's extremely simple and I've found it quite fast and responsive, even on my netbook.
- jokermatt999 15y ago
  I'd also strongly recommend foobar2000. It's incredibly fast, automatically adds music pretty much as soon as it's in the directory, is extremely customizable, and can look really, really nice. It has customizable global hotkeys, addon support, but works well out of the box. If any one is still trying to use iTunes on Windows, I strongly urge you to at least try foobar2000. Once I switched, there was just no way I was going back to iTunes. It alleviates so many of the stupid daily annoyances I had with iTunes.
- tmcw 15y ago
  Er, I should have specified "on a Mac." Foobar is Windows-only AFAIK.
ra 15y ago
Try Banshee
Tomek_ 15y ago
If you're in the one of lucky countries (or have credit card from one of them) I'd suggest Spotify, their client is marvelous (the best UI for a music player ever and also very fast), supports playing local files and since last version also syncing with Apple devices (maybe some others too, haven't had occasion to check).

yankcrime 15y ago

I'd have hoped that an 'iTunes replacement' would be one that's somewhat less bloaty. I don't see Miro filling that gap, given it includes such nonsense as a BitTorrent client.

Argorak 15y ago
Which is actually the greatest feature of Miro. There are a lot of interesting feeds flying around the Miro bittorrent network. For example all confreaks conference videos.
- callahad 15y ago
  Isn't that how Miro started life? As a video player that used torrents for distribution, and RSS feeds for discovery? In that light, the inclusion of a BitTorrent client is less surprising.
  - Argorak 15y ago
    Yes, exactly. And it actually works and is used.

SwellJoe 15y ago

I wish media player developers would stop trying to imitate iTunes. I hate iTunes. It's confusing (it's caused me to delete my entire music collection on my PC on multiple occasions), it's huge and demanding (of my focus/attention, and also computing resources) where it shouldn't be, and its integration with iTunes store is pointless and annoying to me (I don't shop at iTunes). It's great that seemingly high quality cross-platform tools like this are being developed, though I wonder what this does that Songbird (the last big "iTunes replacement" I can think of) does not?

sigzero 15y ago
"It's confusing (it's caused me to delete my entire music collection on my PC on multiple occasions)" What? Ummmm....even my super non-techie wife hasn't done that.
- SwellJoe 15y ago
  I'm Appletarded, and get confused by a lot of Apple software. I don't know how I did it, but it's happened on three separate occasions. Twice on a Windows PC and once on a Mac. Somehow my misunderstanding of the sync feature led to the PC getting what was on the iPod, and the music collection on the PC being deleted. It was many years ago; I eventually learned my lesson and stopped trying to use the damned thing. Maybe it's better/safer now. But, I'll never find out, as I can't think of any reason I'd have to use iTunes.
  - thought_alarm 15y ago
    Syncing your iPod will never delete music from your PC. It is and has always been a one-way sync, PC to iPod, as far as music content is concerned.
    - Tyrannosaurs 15y ago
      Not quite true (music purchased on the iPod will be synced back) but near enough. pedant face

beza1e1 15y ago

Miro is a great application, but i would not call it an "iTunes replacement". I use it as a "video feed reader".

vetler 15y ago

The first thing that struck me was how visually identical to iTunes it was. Considering how Apple sued Samsung over UI similarity, I wouldn't be surprised if Miro could run into similar problems.

runjake 15y ago

"Replacement" is a bit too tough a word. It doesn't sync with (Apple) mobile devices, the primary reason I stick with iTunes. It also seems more sluggish and bloated than iTunes on my MBP i7 running 10.6. Seems like it was released way too prematurely. They could have spent more time building features & polish and utilized their launch hype much better. Sorting through all the marketing fluff, what are the true advantages of Miro?

deleted 15y ago
[deleted]

jz 15y ago

Looks interesting, however I really dislike iTunes' "everything under then sun" motto. If you are looking for something much more lightweight for playing music, check out mpd http://mpd.wikia.com/wiki/Music_Player_Daemon_Wiki http://mpd.wikia.com/wiki/Music_Player_Daemon_Wiki . There is a really nice Mac mpd client called Theremin: http://theremin.sigterm.eu/ http://theremin.sigterm.eu/

aidenn0 15y ago
Thanks for the link. I've been using qmpd on the mac with a lot of success for some time now, but I'll check out the native solution.

vaporstun 15y ago

Horribly annoying that on their website, when I click play on a video then close the popup, the video keeps playing! I tried to view a few clips and they were all playing in the background. Had to re-open the video again and manually press the pause button to stop them. Otherwise, it looks very similar to DoubleTwist but with the addition of syncing iOS devices. Wish it could drop some of the bloat (for example the torrent client) to make it more compelling. It is very tough though to make things more simplified. I know everyone has their gripes with iTunes, but it is very tough to have an interface that is complex enough to combine local management of music, management of apps, music, and videos on a device, a store and still allow the user the power to make decisions about individual songs, etc. I think Apple should diverge them and have the device syncing component as a separate program entirely, but tightly integrated so it can nab playlists, podcasts, etc. from iTunes. I hear iTunes is horrible on Windows, but on Mac it's not too bad and I can't think of many ways they could really optimize it without stripping features that would piss off a lot of users.

uast23 15y ago

Oh I just read the heading 'iTunes replacement', installed it and plugged in my iPhone to see how it behaves; and ta-da nothing happens! My mistake that I did not read the features, but whatever, why do we want to call it an iTunes replacement when it can't even sync

StuffMaster 15y ago

That website makes me not want their software.

olalonde 15y ago
You obviously don't visit much open source software websites. I thought this one wasn't bad at all compared to what I'm used to.

deleted 15y ago

[deleted]

callahad 15y ago
The text actually says "Ben's Phone". I suspect it's an Android device, with which syncing is supported.

antihero 15y ago

How does it handle large (+50,000 files) collections? Also: Oh no, it does that homepage spammy feeling option in the installer thing. This instantly makes me not want to donate, tbh, as it just feels scummy.

NHQ 15y ago

an "open" media player that is trying to eat Apples crumbs and wants independents to join in should have some kind of decentralized market for producers and publishers.

lurker19 15y ago

But can it play files over DAAP? That is the (my) holy grail for Mac music. Songbird sort-of can, in a buggy crashy way. Nothing else U have

lurker19 15y ago

But can it play files over DAAP? That is the (my) holy grail for Mac music. Songbird sort-of can, in a buggy crashy way. Nothing else I have tried (Banshee, Amarok, Rhythmbox, firefly player jar) compiles and loads and runs an plays on Mac.

firethief 15y ago
Yeah, it has DAAP support.

kodisha 15y ago

on mac (MBP laptop): - it doesn't react on previous/play/next buttons on keyboard - no last.fm integration

cormullion 15y ago

I know iTunes isn't very popular with HN readers, so I'll balance things out a bit and play devil's advocate for a while: I like iTunes quite a bit. There are certainly some minor gripes and irritations, particularly with the UI, but overall I'm satisfied with the performance of iTunes and wouldn't want to replace it without much careful thought. I'm not a computer power user, more of a 'system dadmin'; we run iTunes in the house on about six (Mac) computers and half a dozen or so devices. iTunes runs happily on all the computers, ranging from an old original iMac from 2001 (which runs Tiger and iTunes 8 and acts as an internet radio and music 'terminal') to an eMac from 2005 running Leopard and iTunes 10) and various Snow Leopard machines and attached drives. The different copies of iTunes copes with various libraries (the biggest one is 110GB) with apparent ease, and keeps track of the settings on various iPods, including a 60GB classic from 2005, two iPhones, three iPod Touches and a couple of Shuffles. It's easy to play music from other machines around the house - click on the computer's name and start listening to its music. It's also nice that when one of my children, say, buys an app for their iPhone on their iTunes Store account it appears automatically on mine too; similarly if I put music on mine it appears in their library, but of course you can be more selective in what you copy from family members' accounts and machines... I love the power of iTunes playlists - those heavy duty database-query-like nested multiple smart playlists - and it's a great way to control what gets put onto your iPod while it charges and you sleep. I also like: the automatic downloading of the latest podcasts and TV episodes; adding PDFs to my library puts them on my iPhone; broadcasting music around the house using iTunes DJ mode and Rogue Amoeba's Airfoil - controlling the music from any room using the Remote iPhone app (and sometimes letting people select music from their iOS devices); browsing the iTunes University and downloading lectures; tracking my App store spending with Wetfish Software's App Store Expense Monitor; writing new visualizers with Quartz Composer (which is cool if weird); ripping CDs with automatic track naming. I could go on. OK, I'll accept that iTunes is a bizarre behemoth of an application, and has certainly outgrown its moniker. But, for day to day use, people like me find it a solid and reliable media and device 'engine' that doesn't require much thought or effort to use effectively. But don't get me started on those stupid scrolling boxes within boxes... Edit: when I started typing this, I was sure the title said 'Miro 4 ... iTunes replacement ...'. When I finished typing, it didn't. (I went off to work between those two times.) So I was thinking about whether Miro could replace more than 10% of iTunes' functionality. This comment seems less relevant now.

udoprog 15y ago

The hackers solution. A media server running mpd or XMMS2, with the proper metadata organizing utility for your medialib. Plus running mplayer and possibly some ffmpeg tweaking for when you're out in the deep end. Plays anything, anywhere, and leaves the rest up to your imagination. I guess Miro is great, but any complete solution will always be inferior to the proper tools for the right jobs.

olalonde 15y ago

I've been a long time user of VLC media player and unsure if it'd be worthwhile to make the switch. Did anyone transition from VLC to Miro?