I would argue that 'is' or 'is not' censored isn't a useful distinction. The question I would have is what circumstances could compel the provider to de-list/c

I would argue that 'is' or 'is not' censored isn't a useful distinction. The question I would have is what circumstances could compel the provider to de-list/censor the addresses, or their service-providers/supply-chain to drop support for them. The hierarchical nature of the present Internet DNS infrastructure is fundamentally vulnerable to 'censorship'.