4 ms·

Oh really? Which laws/legal tools/precedences are you referring to?

• stonesweep 6y ago
  Took me all of 2 minutes to Google. https://dejure.org/gesetze/TMG/5.html https://dejure.org/gesetze/TMG/5.html https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://dejure.org/gesetze/TMG/5.html https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https...
  • leifg 6y ago
    Where does it say anything in there about censoring a domain?
    • stonesweep 6y ago
      I was replying to the (Edit) by GP (to me) about the Impressum, it appears you were addressing the censorship preceding sentence. I read your reply as a challenge to the second (Edit) statement due to it's passive-aggressive nature and non-specific target subject. You simply said "show me some laws", so I did and here we are.
      • leifg 6y ago
        Fair enough, didn't connect the edit to your comment.
• qwertox 6y ago
  § 100a StPO (Telekommunikationsüberwachung), probably § 100b StPO (Online-Durchsuchung) as well. An interesting thing is that lately authorities not only request logging of IP addresses, but also the port which initiated the connection. For some time I thought that this was ridiculous, but then it turns out that if you use a VPN or a DS-Lite-Gateway, the port will allow you to be identified. Edit: I'm using this edit as a reply to the follow-up question, since I can't reply to it directly. While you are right that a specific domain can't be censored, the provider can be instructed to log requests for that domain name and provide the timestamp/IP/port to the authorities, as well as answer to the client with modified data.
  • leifg 6y ago
    again, where does it say anything about censorship in any of these laws?