3 ms·
I'm a little confused. The worst case scenario for Pandemrix is a tiny chance of developing narcolepsy. Literally a few tens of people for a country. Is that wr
by LatteLazy 6y ago
I'm a little confused. The worst case scenario for Pandemrix is a tiny chance of developing narcolepsy. Literally a few tens of people for a country. Is that wrong?
It seems that would be a very acceptable risk compared to 1% of people dying and 5 years of lockdown...
- antibuddy 6y agoThe lockdown is not a consequence of COVID. The fact that (especially) young people were affected means you need to compare the lethality of these younger groups and that one is below 0.1% (under the age of 60 in Sweden). Is it still worth the risk then for these groups?
- LatteLazy 6y agoObjectively YES. A 0.1% chance of dying is much worse than a 0.0001% chance of narcolepsy. And that's without adding "Long Covid" damage or the lockdown or anything else.