3 ms·
Why does it need to be anonymous? To me it seems the public can't be persuaded that paying for something is better than getting it "for free" (with ads and tra
by hashkb 6y ago
Why does it need to be anonymous? To me it seems the public can't be persuaded that paying for something is better than getting it "for free" (with ads and tracking)
- chris_f 6y ago> "To me it seems the public can't be persuaded that paying for something is better than getting it "for free" (with ads and tracking)" This is even more true when the paid option is often a worse version of the "free" offering.
- PointyFluff 6y agoI pay for the New York times. I still see adds at NYT, they still use trackers. Thankfully, ublock solves this.
- hashkb 6y agoI wrote them about that. You should too. Offer to pay more in exchange for fewer ads. Maybe they'll listen.
- fuzzfactor 6y ago>Why does it need to be anonymous? The public is not actually entirely welcome if there's no privacy.