4 ms·
> though for some reason we haven't made a lot of progress The risk that reprocessing can produce weapons-grade plutonium has been one reason. [1] Frustrati
by Treblemaker 6y ago
> though for some reason we haven't made a lot of progress
The risk that reprocessing can produce weapons-grade plutonium has been one reason. [1] Frustrating not only because it makes it unavailable as an energy source, but, as I understand it, the waste products from fast breeder reactors generally have much shorter half-lives than the current waste.
[1] https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1209/ML120960615.pdf https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1209/ML120960615.pdf
- KirillPanov 6y agoAt what point does the cost of global warming exceed the (huge) cost of adequately securing the reprocessing pipeline? The decision not to do reprocessing was based on 1970s cost/benefit analysis. We're in a different world now.