3 ms·
Both are guilty of this. EMI wasn't under duress to trademark it.
by Joakal 15y ago
Both are guilty of this. EMI wasn't under duress to trademark it.
- dotBen 15y agoUnless someone else was threatening to trademark it instead. I have personal experience of someone having to trademark something simply because if they didn't the other party was going to and then they'd have no choice but to lose all rights to it. Like I said enter discussion about the brokenness of patents, trademarks, etc