3 ms·
Number 2 and 3 are false. Edit: I want e2e encryption but not censorship resistant, not when it starts getting used for inciting to violence. Search for eg "Wh
by cutemonster 6y ago
Number 2 and 3 are false.
Edit: I want e2e encryption but not censorship resistant, not when it starts getting used for inciting to violence. Search for eg "WhatsApp lynch mobs" or "Facebook Myanmar genocide".
- 9dev 6y agoBy very definition, it cannot be "end to end" encryption if it isn't encrypted from one end to another.
- cutemonster 6y agoHere's a way to build true e2e encryption apps that can be, to some extent, censored: NLP locally in the phone -- an AI that slightly understand what the user writes -- and if it's (I'm oversimplifying) like "kill all ...", then the AI bricks the phone. Otherwise it's e2e as usual.
- croes 6y agoAn AI that understand what the user writes? We are far away from that. "All my service processes hang." "Kill all" Bricked
- DetroitThrow 6y agoIt seems unclear what you mean by 2 and 3 being false - plenty of folks want those things.
- cutemonster 6y agoAbout 3: I want software patents to not exist also if I get a good patent, so GGP's "everyone" is inaccurate. (But I guess I'd taken Elastic's approach and switched to SSPL) About 2: i replied here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25798359 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25798359