4 ms·
Why not take 16:9 and do portrait orientation?
by rawsyntax 15y ago
Why not take 16:9 and do portrait orientation?
- damncabbage 15y agoEver viewed one from more than 15 degrees off-axis? It starts looking strange really quickly. (I realise these guys would get the same problem with the 3:4 arrangement, but let this at least be a warning to anybody eyeing up a potential vertical 16:9 setup.)
- superkarn 15y agoGet IPS panels. They have much better viewing angles and look fine when rotated 90 degrees.
- hcurtiss 15y agoThe desktop setup was just an example, and you're right that we could rotate any screen, as long as the horizontal resolution (vertical resolution at 0 degrees) is at least 1024. In the laptop world (per the article), it's difficult to do portrait orientation and still type. :)