For the purposes of this analogy, it doesn't matter what they should be allowed to do, what matters is what they are legally allowed to. Likewise there is a ver

For the purposes of this analogy, it doesn't matter what they should be allowed to do, what matters is what they are legally allowed to. Likewise there is a very legitimate argument that laws should be changed so that twitter would not have the legal authority to kick people off its platform arbitrarily, but the entire point of the analogy is that there is a difference between what is legally permissible and socially acceptable.