I see tweets here: https://web.archive.org/web/20201225111818/https://twitter.com/Sci_Hub https://web.archive.org/web/20201225111818/https://twitter.c... I us

I see tweets here: https://web.archive.org/web/20201225111818/https://twitter.com/Sci_Hub https://web.archive.org/web/20201225111818/https://twitter.c... I use Chromium for this because on Firefox I have the Referer header disabled and that causes the WaybackMachine to return a 498 HTTP status on an internal API call, but otherwise I see no issues. Images: https://ibb.co/1mRqyvW https://ibb.co/1mRqyvW https://ibb.co/F8TbCLv https://ibb.co/F8TbCLv https://ibb.co/P1xZwZT https://ibb.co/P1xZwZT > I'm surprised Twitter is archivable in the first place I'm sure it must have taken some effort by the IA team, but Twitter is a pretty important source to archive, so I'm not as surprised because of that. They simply rock and can be expected of greatness. The infinite scroll works, but zooming on images doesn't. That's a bit of a shame because Twitter clips them, and they can sometimes contain important content. Loading replies also doesn't work. Still way better than nothing.