They are a public company (private in the sense I know you mean it) and should be treated as such. They are a public company that publishes certain opinions by

They are a public company (private in the sense I know you mean it) and should be treated as such. They are a public company that publishes certain opinions by allowing individuals who are willing to espouse those opinions access, while not allowing others. They are a public company that blocks other opinions from being heard (on other platforms) in association with other technology giants, by removing the ability for other private or public corps any access to meaningful internet services unless they do not stay in the opinion lanes the giants are comfortable with. They are a public company that is using their position and status to shape public discourse in the United States, and they should absolutely be treated as such. Here's hoping.