5 ms·

Reduced cores from ~40k to ~20k by moving to .NET Core

30 points by benaadams 6y ago

akmittal 6y ago
.Net has shown some impressive performance improvements with .Net core. Double the performance of already performent runtime is commandable. .net is now much faster tha Java on all but one benchmark https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/fastest/csharp.html https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/...
- gher-shyu3i 6y ago
  .NET has made tremendous strides in performance, kudos to the team. That being said, some of the results of those benchmarks do not hold on modern CPUs. Try to run the binarytrees benchmark for example (especially in a loop) and you'll see that the JVM is quicker than .NET, especially after JIT kicks in.
  - igouy 6y ago
    Please show what you measured and how you measured.
    - gher-shyu3i 6y ago
      Java (openjdk 15.0.1 2020-10-20) $ java binarytrees 21 stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 2.640825365s stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 1.856262182s stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 1.650234063s C# (.NET Core 5.0.100) $ dotnet run -c Release 21 stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 00:00:09.2958748 stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 00:00:09.8271153 stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 00:00:09.8948142
      - igouy 6y ago
        The benchmarks game shows 2.5 elapsed secs for Java and 2.4 for C# You seem to be showing 2.6s for Java but 9.9s for C# ? Did you use ServerGarbageCollection for C# ?
        gher-shyu3i 6y ago
        > Did you use ServerGarbageCollection for C# ? I have not. Thanks for pointing it out.
        gher-shyu3i 6y ago
        Now that I set it, it's quite a bit faster, though not as fast as Java: $ java binarytrees 21 stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 2.841672099s stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 1.653618362s stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 1.471093907s $ dotnet ./bin/Release/net5.0/osx-x64/binarytree.dll 21 stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 00:00:01.8994677 stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 00:00:01.8563705 stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 00:00:01.7578978
    - gher-shyu3i 6y ago
      Note how the JVM JIT kicks in from the 2nd iteration onward. This was tested on a 2019 Macbook pro 2.6GHz i7. I took the fastest Java and C# submissions.
      - igouy 6y ago
        What code changes have you made to make repeat timings? Or did you use JMH ?
deleted 6y ago
[deleted]
syspec 6y ago
When they say 40k cores do they really mean 40,000 cores? Or is that some type of kube measurement system I'm not familiar with
akmittal 6y ago
Earlier bing also moved from .net Framework to .net core and saw 34% improvement. https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/bing-com-runs-on-net-core-2-1/ https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/bing-com-runs-on-net-c...

30 points by benaadams 6y ago

.Net has shown some impressive performance improvements with .Net core. Double the performance of already performent runtime is commandable. .net is now much faster tha Java on all but one benchmark https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/fastest/csharp.html https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/...

gher-shyu3i 6y ago
.NET has made tremendous strides in performance, kudos to the team. That being said, some of the results of those benchmarks do not hold on modern CPUs. Try to run the binarytrees benchmark for example (especially in a loop) and you'll see that the JVM is quicker than .NET, especially after JIT kicks in.
- igouy 6y ago
  Please show what you measured and how you measured.
  - gher-shyu3i 6y ago
    Java (openjdk 15.0.1 2020-10-20) $ java binarytrees 21 stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 2.640825365s stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 1.856262182s stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 1.650234063s C# (.NET Core 5.0.100) $ dotnet run -c Release 21 stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 00:00:09.2958748 stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 00:00:09.8271153 stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 00:00:09.8948142
    - igouy 6y ago
      The benchmarks game shows 2.5 elapsed secs for Java and 2.4 for C# You seem to be showing 2.6s for Java but 9.9s for C# ? Did you use ServerGarbageCollection for C# ?
      - gher-shyu3i 6y ago
        > Did you use ServerGarbageCollection for C# ? I have not. Thanks for pointing it out.
      - gher-shyu3i 6y ago
        Now that I set it, it's quite a bit faster, though not as fast as Java: $ java binarytrees 21 stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 2.841672099s stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 1.653618362s stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 1.471093907s $ dotnet ./bin/Release/net5.0/osx-x64/binarytree.dll 21 stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 00:00:01.8994677 stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 00:00:01.8563705 stretch tree of depth 22 check: 8388607 2097152 trees of depth 4 check: 65011712 524288 trees of depth 6 check: 66584576 131072 trees of depth 8 check: 66977792 32768 trees of depth 10 check: 67076096 8192 trees of depth 12 check: 67100672 2048 trees of depth 14 check: 67106816 512 trees of depth 16 check: 67108352 128 trees of depth 18 check: 67108736 32 trees of depth 20 check: 67108832 long lived tree of depth 21 check: 4194303 Time taken: 00:00:01.7578978
  - gher-shyu3i 6y ago
    Note how the JVM JIT kicks in from the 2nd iteration onward. This was tested on a 2019 Macbook pro 2.6GHz i7. I took the fastest Java and C# submissions.
    - igouy 6y ago
      What code changes have you made to make repeat timings? Or did you use JMH ?

deleted 6y ago

[deleted]

syspec 6y ago

When they say 40k cores do they really mean 40,000 cores? Or is that some type of kube measurement system I'm not familiar with

akmittal 6y ago

Earlier bing also moved from .net Framework to .net core and saw 34% improvement. https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/bing-com-runs-on-net-core-2-1/ https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/bing-com-runs-on-net-c...