The decision wasn't political. It was based on repeated terms of service violations (as proven by the emails from AWS that Parler itself leaked). Whether AWS w

The decision wasn't political. It was based on repeated terms of service violations (as proven by the emails from AWS that Parler itself leaked). Whether AWS was able to make that decision because of the political calculus had changed (e.g. there was demonstrable evidence of real-life violence stemming from plans made on Parler; others had taken action against Parler; AWS's employees were publicly calling for Parler to be removed from AWS) -- that's a different question. The timing can be political but the decision apolitical. This is ignoring that Parler's continued prior existence was likely in part due to the politics (i.e. American conservative allegations that Big Tech's pervasively censors right-wing and Republican voices).