3 ms·
As usual, no one bothered to properly archive it and people took screenshots instead. So unfortunately, neither archive.today nor wayback machine has it and the
by ttt0 6y ago
As usual, no one bothered to properly archive it and people took screenshots instead. So unfortunately, neither archive.today nor wayback machine has it and the last capture before that was in 2016. But even Snopes confirms it, if you don't want to take my word for it.
- nitrogen 6y agoSnopes link for the curious: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/merriam-webster-barrett-sexual/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/merriam-webster-barrett-se... Is there a regularly updated official list somewhere of newly-considered-offensive words so one can proactively update one's vocabulary?
- ttt0 6y agoOther than regularly following Twitter drama or joining some Discord echo chamber, I honestly don't think there is any reliable way to know what is now considered offensive and what is not. The reason why All Lives Matter is considered racist is literally based on some obscure web comic about burning houses from years ago and everyone will get angry at you if you don't understand what the hell are they even talking about. Oh and by the way, silence == violence, so it's not like staying apolitical will help you much. https://static.attn.com/sites/default/files/allhousesmatter.png https://static.attn.com/sites/default/files/allhousesmatter....