3 ms·
That is a fair question/comment. In my original comment "Limit use of automated content moderation only for easy to solve cases like child pornography." . It is
by iamsb 6y ago
That is a fair question/comment. In my original comment "Limit use of automated content moderation only for easy to solve cases like child pornography." . It is reasonable to extent that list beyond just child pornography. I did not intend to give impression than this list is exhaustive.
In case of spam - Emails do show you spam emails, just hide them behind a spam folder. So instead of outright removal, it is possible to use similar techniques. And let users decide whether they ever want to see spam comments.
- daveoc64 6y ago> It is reasonable to extent that list beyond just child pornography. Seems like you're just back to square one there. You're making a list of unacceptable content. Whatever you put on there, someone's going to disagree. Whether it's automated or not probably isn't the issue. I see a lot of comment sections ruined by the typical bot spam (e.g. "I earn $5000 a minute working from home for Google").