4 ms·

The link you posted to courtlistener.com shows that Parler responded within two days to Amazon's request and apologized it took them a long time. You wrote tha

by IncRnd 6y ago

The link you posted to courtlistener.com shows that Parler responded within two days to Amazon's request and apologized it took them a long time. You wrote that Amazon warned Parler about their content, but that's not what your link shows. It shows that Amazon asked a question about policies regarding specific posts, and Parler answered with their policies.

imnotlost 6y ago
This is what AWS said in their letter to Parler before cutting them off. It sounds reasonable enough to me https://www.gadgetsnow.com/tech-news/read-amazons-letter-to-social-networking-app-parler-on-its-removal/articleshow/80206778.cms https://www.gadgetsnow.com/tech-news/read-amazons-letter-to-...
- IncRnd 6y ago
  Thanks!
arp242 6y ago
Full story: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/01/filing-amazon-warned-parler-for-months-about-more-than-100-violent-threats/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/01/filing-amazon-wa... Also note that it wasn't removed. I'm not even going to repeat that post here, but absolutely no platform would keep this online if reported, so "very similar terms of service to other content companies" as someone up this thread claimed isn't exactly true.
- deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]
- deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]