>That's a straw-man argument. Sorry, but I'm really just trying to understand your position on this, so hopefully I can learn something too - not argue against

>That's a straw-man argument. Sorry, but I'm really just trying to understand your position on this, so hopefully I can learn something too - not argue against you. I'm not trying to pull a gotcha. >I didn't say no power to prevent speech is legitimate. You said it's "problematic". What did you mean by that?