I am a DL researcher and practitioner. Any response to criticism that brushes off the criticism based on the source of the criticism is bad and not in the scie

I am a DL researcher and practitioner. Any response to criticism that brushes off the criticism based on the source of the criticism is bad and not in the scientific spirit. Progress comes by asking questions and pointing out flaws. You don't need to have an answer to the question before you ask the question. Marcus's criticisms are valid. Most DL researchers have a huge blind spot. It is not good for the field.