3 ms·
So I've been reading everybody's comments as this comes up about five times a day now and did a little research [1] and the following is what I've come up with
by guerrilla 6y ago
So I've been reading everybody's comments as this comes up about five times a day now and did a little research [1] and the following is what I've come up with for these platforms:
- They must censor what's illegal
- They may censor what violates TOS
- They may not censor what is not illegal and does not violate TOS
I think breaking these rules would automatically convert you from a platform to a publisher and you'd have to follow whatever those rules are. Spam handling would have to be part of the TOS. I'm looking for feedback. What would be the problem with this? Doesn't it seem fair?
I haven't thought about it much but I wonder if this would also work for cancelling contracts/refusal of service but that's a whole other topic.
1. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/freedom-speech/ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/freedom-speech/
- tremon 6y agoYou're missing the part where "what's illegal" varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. No international platform can simultaneously comply with points 1 and 3 everywhere in the world.
- guerrilla 6y agoI'm not missing that poiny but my post is. What is presented would have to vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Good point to bring up though, especially for we who wouod have to implement it.