3 ms·
Politics aside this is an interesting situation in that social media companies have forever sought special protections based on the claimed impossibility of the
by zxcvbn4038 6y ago
Politics aside this is an interesting situation in that social media companies have forever sought special protections based on the claimed impossibility of their moderating user content - turns out they can moderate content just fine when they want to, so maybe it’s time for their special protections to end, and for them to be responsible for their content.
You can blame Twitter for shattering the myth since they keep broadcasting the number of accounts they are suspending and hash tags they are banning, at this point it’s impossible to backtrack and say it’s too hard to do - and if Twitter can do it then it’s hard for any of the other giants to say they can not.
I’m betting in future we’ll see these companies held to the same standards that newspapers, tv, and radio are held to today.
- soco 6y agoDeleting one guy's account requires much less moderating resources than evaluating each post of an army of bots. So this particular case doesn't prove anything about their moderation capabilities. Yes, they COULD technically look at each and every account and each and every post, but I can't imagine any entity, private or not, having the resources to do so. Which leaves us to the manual banning (irregular, mostly high profile = low hanging fruit) or AI based solutions (and we know already how good they work)