I have no idea what you're talking about. Honestly I think you're a bit out of touch with how people use the internet today. I've got two monitors. I've playe

I have no idea what you're talking about. Honestly I think you're a bit out of touch with how people use the internet today. I've got two monitors. I've played an MMORPG before where I have a YouTube video playing on the other monitor. This has been possible for probably 10 years. Also yes. People live in homes with other people either as a family or house/flat sharing. Who all use the internet at the same time. What if they all want to watch 4k video in their room? Whilst their consoles (Nintendo Switch, PS5 or Xbox Series X) are downloading games/updates. If they want to maintain 4k streaming, they're going to need a fast download speed. Google Stadia, Amazon Luna, Nvidia GeforceNow are game streaming applications, they require good throughput in addition to low latency. Low latency requires an uncongested connection. What if they work on photos and videos in the cloud? They can load them up faster to work on. Rather than requiring a signifant local storage. Especially if they have symmetric upload speeds. 100Mbps+ is clearly beneficial. You're conflating your lack of need for fast internet with everyone else not needing it.