3 ms·
thanks for the thorough comment. the article is, unfortunately, just clickbait.
by JacobSuperslav 6y ago
thanks for the thorough comment. the article is, unfortunately, just clickbait.
- nvarsj 6y agoIt seems like a common trend with M1 articles on HN lately.
- coldtea 6y agoThe comment is bogus empty snark (and factually wrong). The arguments made (and I use the word arguments loosely): "Too few trainable_params compared to GTP3". GTP3 is several orders of magnitude higher than what people train, and so it's a useless comparison. It's like we're comparing a bike to an e-bike, and someone says "yeah, but can the e-bike run faster than a rocket?" Second argument "Sure, it's faster than a machine that costs 3-4 fives more, but you should instead compare it to a machine that costs even more than that". I can only take it as a troll comment.
- joseph_grobbles 6y agoThorough? Their comment is noisy snark. A huge number of models are "small". I'm currently training game units for autonomous behaviors. The M1 is massively oversized for my need. Saying "Oh look, GPT-3" just stupidifies the conversation, and is classic dismissive nonsense.