4 ms·
You could have used that argument to poo-poo someone proposing anything that was thought to be impossible before it was shown to be possible.
by guerrilla 6y ago
You could have used that argument to poo-poo someone proposing anything that was thought to be impossible before it was shown to be possible.
- at_a_remove 6y ago"We don't know what we don't know" is the ultimate gateway to wish fulfillment. It's not fruitful for anything other than fantasy. Who is to say that I cannot write an AI in under 1,000 lines of C? We don't know what we don't know. By all means, pursue that line of inquiry if you feel that the odds are with you. It's just not a useful heuristic for deciding what to spend your resources (time, money, effort, energy, etc.) on.
- guerrilla 6y agoYou keep mentioning examples people are fully familiar with and comparing it to something nobody is familiar with.
- at_a_remove 6y agoI do not know what you mean. I don't know what to tell you other than the following: Nearly every "Can't We Just ...?" is old. It's kind of irritating in a way, because people behave as if their thoughts on FTL (or overunity motors to break conservation of energy, or whatever) are new and unconsidered, but they end up being just about ancient and well-worn, and it's the equivalent of some bright spark saying, "Hey, why don't we just merge the Windows and Linux kernels? Should be easy!" or "Can't you just make it know what I want?" with reference to some program. To be sure there are nuts working in their garages on various projects, but in the scientific community, nobody is holding their breath on these fantastic breakthroughs.