> Except most people don't already spend 40h per week reading books or practicing their crafts. If someone does the average only (40 hrs) and does 7 hours of p

> Except most people don't already spend 40h per week reading books or practicing their crafts. If someone does the average only (40 hrs) and does 7 hours of personal learning on their craft in their spare time - nobody would consider them a workaholic. That's what I'm trying to say. I work more than the average just like many on this board. Well guess what? I'm more skilled than the average. And I have a wider range of skills than most (from software engineering to marketing). I didn't get there by clocking 40 at each role or at my own businesses. And I probably wouldn't have been able to build successful businesses without going deep into learning for years ahead of time. To many - the extra work hours are a focus on their craft and learning. I'll add marketing tech skills. Or customer acquisition skills. Or finance. If I was reading marketing books for 7 hours per week that wouldn't be equated with working. That would be called learning. And to many people - that's a huge part of their life. Just because my hobby or thirst of information may include "work", doesn't mean people with knitting hobbies after they clock out 40 have a better work/life balance. To me - some of my work is a hobby because I find it fascinating and I'll explore different industries much like someone may explore different cuisines in their home chef hobby. Also - I still have more regular hobbies than most people I know, because apart from some Hacker News time, I don't spend 2-3 hours daily on social media like most people. I don't get the work/life movement (apart from employer abuse of some employees). Do you truly enjoy your life or not? Life balance is more appropriate to consider.