And yet, in the Amazon suit, Amazon clearly says that Parler did not. So, it's not "factually false". At best, it's up for a court of law to decide who is tell

And yet, in the Amazon suit, Amazon clearly says that Parler did not. So, it's not "factually false". At best, it's up for a court of law to decide who is telling the truth. But considering that it's trivial to show messages from Lin Wood, among others at the capital protests messages on parler calling for "appeals to violence" exactly in contradiction to your suggestion that there isn't... Well your argument doesn't appear supported by the facts.