More bad-faith argument than refresher on CNN's part. The right (or lack thereof) to someone else's platform is well understood. What they are intentionally i

More bad-faith argument than refresher on CNN's part. The right (or lack thereof) to someone else's platform is well understood. What they are intentionally ignoring here are the procedures and protections typically extended to users of quasi-monopolistic platforms (esp. utilities). So, instead of participating in an honest debate, they paint the other as being simply too dumb to grasp the 1st amendment. Slimy.