> thought provoking articles, or just fuel confirmation bias for their readers? I'd argue that NYT has fallen into the latter, with dissenting voices stifled

> thought provoking articles, or just fuel confirmation bias for their readers? I'd argue that NYT has fallen into the latter, with dissenting voices stifled internally, example Bari Weiss: https://www.poynter.org/newsletters/2020/breaking-down-the-controversial-resignation-of-new-york-times-opinion-writer-bari-weiss/ https://www.poynter.org/newsletters/2020/breaking-down-the-c... https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2020/07/14/bari-weiss-resigns-new-york-times/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2020/07/14/bari-weiss-r...