4 ms·
Well that’s just social convention, and I don’t place much emphasis on that. I reserve the right to address anyone I choose as “doctor”, and if Stallman prefers
by bjornsing 6y ago
Well that’s just social convention, and I don’t place much emphasis on that. I reserve the right to address anyone I choose as “doctor”, and if Stallman prefers to be addressed that way I’m happy to oblige. He has certainly earned it in my book.
Same goes for Benjamin Franklin btw, whom I see you left out of your list.
- chrisseaton 6y agoYou’re free to call him Saint IGNUcius if you want - many people do - and it’s a similar level of connection to reality.
- bjornsing 6y agoI find this kind of credentialism a bit silly to be honest. If there’s anything with little connection to reality it’s 90% of dissertations.
- chrisseaton 6y ago> I find this kind of credentialism a bit silly to be honest I can understand this opinion, but surely the most intensely silly credential is a credential you granted yourself?
- bjornsing 6y agoI don't know. It's the "appeal to authority" that makes it silly in my eyes. It's sort of the opposite of the scientific mindset, and that bothers me. Stallman or Franklin calling themselves "Doctor" I can definitely live with.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- NonEUCitizen 6y agoTrying to call yourself "Dr." when you don't have a real PhD is the worst kind of credentialism. I call my friends with real PhD's by their first names and they're fine with that.
- bjornsing 6y ago> I call my friends with real PhD's by their first names and they're fine with that. Would you seriously consider anything else? If a friend of mine with a PhD told me to adress him as "Doctor" I would assume he was joking...