> Policy enforcement based on feelings is inherently arbitrary and contrary to the rule of law This is entirely not true in the real world. When a prosecutor b

> Policy enforcement based on feelings is inherently arbitrary and contrary to the rule of law This is entirely not true in the real world. When a prosecutor brings a charge against someone, all sorts of factors are taken into account, based on prior law. The charge of "menacing" is a great example. How about "making threatening statements"? Or any number of other obvious examples that rely on subjective interpretation within a context.