4 ms·
I wrote an article titled "Platforms are for Suckers" back in June, 2010. Fred jumped in the comments and wrote: http://spencerfry.com/platforms-are-for-sucker
by spencerfry 15y ago
I wrote an article titled "Platforms are for Suckers" back in June, 2010. Fred jumped in the comments and wrote:
http://spencerfry.com/platforms-are-for-suckers#c-2172711 http://spencerfry.com/platforms-are-for-suckers#c-2172711
"spencer
i don't totally agree with you
clearly the web is the platform you want to be building on long term
but building on platforms can get you to scale more quickly and less expensively than building on the open web
if you asked mark pincus if he'd have built zynga on facebook if he could start all over, he'd say yes without even thinking about it
if you asked betaworks if they'd have built bit.ly on twitter if they could start all over, they'd say yes without even thinking about it
if you asked howard lindzon if he'd have built stocktwits on twitter before moving to the open web, he's say yes without even thinking about it
the trick is to understand that platforms are a means to an end not an end in themselves"
I think his comments above may flesh out the point he made on stage (although I didn't see the live video so I can't say for sure).
- fredwilson 15y agoyup, that's my point
- evangineer 15y agoSo, platforms are for bootstrapping?!