6 ms·
His intent might not be malicious, but accusing the other person of doing something to undermine free software that's so bad it should be "cancelled" is not ver
by spiralx 6y ago
His intent might not be malicious, but accusing the other person of doing something to undermine free software that's so bad it should be "cancelled" is not very nice.
He certainly isn't advocating for code being free here, it's literally the opposite.
- arp242 6y agorms' entire problem is that he fails to understand there is more than one way to advocate user freedom. My viewpoint, which is also the viewpoint of pretty much everyone in that thread, is that the best way is to write the best possible software possible. Same goals, just different methods. But there isn't even a discussion about that here, it's just a hard shutdown of these type of arguments from rms. Is it any surprise that almost any project rms has any technical influence on has been in decline?