5 ms·
This article doesn't do him justice, he was one of the key people behind the 386 project which saved Intel during its first major crisis. After that, he went on
by mepian 6y ago
This article doesn't do him justice, he was one of the key people behind the 386 project which saved Intel during its first major crisis. After that, he went on to become the lead of the 486 project and kept moving up on the management ladder until the Larrabee fiasco.
- ghaff 6y agoThat is so typically Wikipedia. 10,000 word articles on trivial subjects and basically a stub listicle for an article on the longtime CEO of one of the largest (but "uncool") software companies in the world.
- NonEUCitizen 6y agoYou are free to edit and expand the article.
- Der_Einzige 6y agoNo he isn't, someone will instantly undue the changes unless he's a respected member of the wikipedia politburo. Found this out the hard way when I tried to edit some articles about Max Stirner. They don't even like small changes by randoms...
- thunkshift1 6y agoWhy was larrabee considered a fiasco?
- daniel-thompson 6y agoBecause it failed in its intended goal, which was to create a viable competitor to AMD and Nvidia at the high-end of the GPU market.
- wing-_-nuts 6y agoI'm not sure that was the goal? From reading about it, it sounded like intel was trying to develop a high performance apu?