Yes it's the decent thing to do. Building a tool that works juuuuust enough for people to set it up and start relying on it, and then never ever fixing the mos

Yes it's the decent thing to do. Building a tool that works juuuuust enough for people to set it up and start relying on it, and then never ever fixing the most salient and impactful bugs because "people aren't entitled anything after all" is just wrong. It would be much more honest to state up front that said tool should not be relied on for any use beyond one's hobby, that it will not be supported, and that the whole package is just "up there" for anyone interested, without any guarantee. And no, having that written in the default LICENSE file is not sufficient.