4 ms·

why doesn't your definition of racism also have parity with Wikipedia? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism

nitsky 6y ago
From the article: > According to dictionaries, the word is commonly used to describe prejudice and discrimination based on race. That seems to match what I wrote above.
- ziaddotcom 6y ago
  According to dictionaries, the word is commonly used to describe prejudice and discrimination based on race.[48][49] From the two citations: [48] Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized. [49] a belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race Apple choosing to invest in educational and entrepreneurial programs for "Black and Brown companies" is in no way antagonism towards other races nor is it an indication that Apple supports a belief that any race is superior.
- nitsky 6y ago
  > Apple choosing to invest in educational and entrepreneurial programs for "Black and Brown companies" is in no way antagonism towards other races nor is it an indication that Apple supports a belief that any race is superior. I agree that it does not indicate "antagonism" or "superiority", but you left out "discrimination", which is right there in the definition in your comment. I believe that apple's program "discriminates" on the basis of race, and therefore is racist.
  - ziaddotcom 6y ago
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrimination https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrimination "Discrimination is the act of making unjustified distinctions between human beings based on the groups, classes, or other categories to which they are perceived to belong.[1] People may be discriminated on the basis of race, gender, age or sexual orientation, as well as other categories.[2] Discrimination especially occurs when individuals or groups are unfairly treated in a way which is worse than other people are treated, on the basis of their actual or perceived membership in certain groups or social categories.[2][3] It involves restricting members of one group from opportunities or privileges that are available to members of another group.[4] Do you think Apple giving 100MM specifically to "Black and Brown companies" is unjustified?
    - nitsky 6y ago
      Yes, I do think it is unjustified. In your quote: "It involves restricting members of one group from opportunities or privileges that are available to members of another group." Apple is restricting people who are not black or brown from this opportunity.
      - ziaddotcom 6y ago
        In what way does Apple giving 10MM to Harlem Capital restrict people who are not Black or Brown people from the opportunity to pitch their fund. https://harlem.capital/pitch/ https://harlem.capital/pitch/ The first of their five pillars: "We invest in founders from all backgrounds, genders and walks of life"
        Grustaf 6y ago
        That’s great to hear, but in what sense would that be “investing in black and brown people” then?

nitsky 6y ago

From the article: > According to dictionaries, the word is commonly used to describe prejudice and discrimination based on race. That seems to match what I wrote above.

ziaddotcom 6y ago
According to dictionaries, the word is commonly used to describe prejudice and discrimination based on race.[48][49] From the two citations: [48] Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized. [49] a belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race Apple choosing to invest in educational and entrepreneurial programs for "Black and Brown companies" is in no way antagonism towards other races nor is it an indication that Apple supports a belief that any race is superior.
nitsky 6y ago
> Apple choosing to invest in educational and entrepreneurial programs for "Black and Brown companies" is in no way antagonism towards other races nor is it an indication that Apple supports a belief that any race is superior. I agree that it does not indicate "antagonism" or "superiority", but you left out "discrimination", which is right there in the definition in your comment. I believe that apple's program "discriminates" on the basis of race, and therefore is racist.
- ziaddotcom 6y ago
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrimination https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrimination "Discrimination is the act of making unjustified distinctions between human beings based on the groups, classes, or other categories to which they are perceived to belong.[1] People may be discriminated on the basis of race, gender, age or sexual orientation, as well as other categories.[2] Discrimination especially occurs when individuals or groups are unfairly treated in a way which is worse than other people are treated, on the basis of their actual or perceived membership in certain groups or social categories.[2][3] It involves restricting members of one group from opportunities or privileges that are available to members of another group.[4] Do you think Apple giving 100MM specifically to "Black and Brown companies" is unjustified?
  - nitsky 6y ago
    Yes, I do think it is unjustified. In your quote: "It involves restricting members of one group from opportunities or privileges that are available to members of another group." Apple is restricting people who are not black or brown from this opportunity.
    - ziaddotcom 6y ago
      In what way does Apple giving 10MM to Harlem Capital restrict people who are not Black or Brown people from the opportunity to pitch their fund. https://harlem.capital/pitch/ https://harlem.capital/pitch/ The first of their five pillars: "We invest in founders from all backgrounds, genders and walks of life"
      - Grustaf 6y ago
        That’s great to hear, but in what sense would that be “investing in black and brown people” then?