4 ms·
Same for the templates, presumably; `std::atomic` isn’t a type in C++, it’s a template. To be analogous with the C code, this was probably meant to read `std::a
by klmr 6y ago
Same for the templates, presumably; `std::atomic` isn’t a type in C++, it’s a template. To be analogous with the C code, this was probably meant to read `std::atomic<unsigned>`.