4 ms·
I've been using s3ql for a while, but this looks great. After testing it for a few hours, the performance seems solid. I'm glad it has a data cache feature like
by angristan 6y ago
I've been using s3ql for a while, but this looks great. After testing it for a few hours, the performance seems solid. I'm glad it has a data cache feature like s3ql.
- daviesliu 6y agoThanks for verifying that. I have saw people asking SQL database support for s3ql, to make s3ql accessible from multiple machines, right now, JuiceFS could be a choice.