3 ms·
Yeah, I can imagine that payment links can potentially be used as a loophole for selling unauthorized in-app payment items outside the store. But this is not th
by segfaultbuserr 6y ago
Yeah, I can imagine that payment links can potentially be used as a loophole for selling unauthorized in-app payment items outside the store. But this is not the case here, nothing is sold, it's literally only a link to the project home page, https://wireguard.com/donations/ https://wireguard.com/donations/.
- zaarn 6y agoSimple solution, there are human reviewers for this kinda reason and if the rule is "Open Source Apps get a donation button" then not any random can loophole around. Heck, if both Apple and Google offered a solution by which you provide the source code to build, any necessary secret variables for the build and then it gives you those extra privileges, it would be nice. But that costs money the open source apps don't have.
- comeonseriously 6y agoApple could win a hole lot of points here by processing the donations themselves. The upside for them is that it would close the loophole.
- zaarn 6y agoOnly if they don't take a fee, to effectively steal donation money for themselves.