4 ms·
> “The bakers could not refuse to supply their goods to Mr Lee because he was a gay man or supported gay marriage, but that is quite different from obliging the
by cheph 6y ago
> “The bakers could not refuse to supply their goods to Mr Lee because he was a gay man or supported gay marriage, but that is quite different from obliging them to supply a cake iced with a message with which they profoundly disagreed.”
He would not have made that cake for anyone. Twitter on the other hand has no problem carrying much more egregious messages than Trumps, just not for Trump. So not really comparable.
- eppp 6y agoI think we can all agree that shouting into an empty field in Nebraska is quite different than grabbing a bullhorn in front of a crowd and encouraging them to attack people. Twitter is no different. Or if you like the fire analogy, shouting fire while you are by yourself is quite a bit different than doing it in a movie theater.
- cheph 6y ago> grabbing a bullhorn in front of a crowd and encouraging them to attack people. This is not why Twitter banned Trump: https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/suspension.html https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/suspensio... So not sure what the relevance is. But I guess it is not less relevant than the example of the baker.