Nobody is advocating the position outlined over your "fiction" heading, your "truth" section talks about only about likelihood and details like the total mass o

Nobody is advocating the position outlined over your "fiction" heading, your "truth" section talks about only about likelihood and details like the total mass of the contaminants are irrelevant figures. As for the "deeper truth" section, why would historians need to be informed of this if they had access to 2020 news stories already? And how would a false (or, worse, true) claim about committing such an act bolster the credibility of other information related to the crash?