No, you have to convince more people in dense cities to get the same voting power, because of the electoral college. At the extreme, you have to convince 3.6 p

No, you have to convince more people in dense cities to get the same voting power, because of the electoral college. At the extreme, you have to convince 3.6 people in california to have the same electoral vote impact as convincing just one voter in Wyoming, and that’s before taking into account that being a winner take all system in most states, you have to influence up to half of California in the worst case, before getting any return on investment. https://www.thestreet.com/personal-finance/how-much-voting-power-do-you-really-have-in-your-state https://www.thestreet.com/personal-finance/how-much-voting-p... You would have to make the argument that people in cities are cheaper per capita to convince, because of their density; cheap enough to offset these massive differences in electoral power. I don’t buy it, as dense cities have the most expensive media markets and modern internet advertising can easily target rural areas.