3 ms·
Parler has to find a private company willing to accept money to build and maintain a soapbox for you to speak that hate from. AWS is not obligated to that. The
by barnaclejive 6y ago
Parler has to find a private company willing to accept money to build and maintain a soapbox for you to speak that hate from. AWS is not obligated to that.
The speech is free, the soapbox is not (unless it is not privately owned).
"Do we have evidence" - seems the answer is "yes", have you read the AWS letter?
- coryfklein 6y agoAh! Thanks for pointing me in the right direction! From said letter: > Over the past several weeks, we’ve reported 98 examples to Parler of posts that clearly encourage and incite violence. > ... > This is further demonstrated by the fact that you still have not taken down much of the content that we’ve sent you.
- HeyZuess 6y agoAnd that sums up the whole point. Even if we succumb to the idea of Parler being protected by the 1st Amendment, some one must still be will to provide the infrastructure. These companies have simply exercised their own rights. There could be an argument about monopolies, or their rights to censorship, but to say this is about 1st Amendment rights is rather distracting.