4 ms·
The whole debate has been framed in terms of free speech. Which is misleading. Because, technically, any corporation are free to impose their policies, as long
by dmode 6y ago
The whole debate has been framed in terms of free speech. Which is misleading. Because, technically, any corporation are free to impose their policies, as long as they abide by the laws of the state. The debate should be pivoted to tech concentration and monopoly. This has been argued by Elizabeth Warren during her presidential run. However, the same people who are complaining about tech's supposed censor of free speech, where vehemently against Warren's plan for tech break up