3 ms·
This proves the point. It is legal, but no one even offered such a package.
by skynet-9000 6y ago
This proves the point. It is legal, but no one even offered such a package.
- woodrowbarlow 6y agoif you say so. i think they're waiting to see whether the new administration will overturn. in any case, the main point is about ISPs creating profitable incentive for themselves to keep infrastructure under-developed by making the internet a pay-to-play arena.
- woodrowbarlow 6y agofollow up: t-mobile has a plan in the US that doesn't charge you for spotify/pandora internet traffic, but does charge you for all other data. that's an "internet lite" plan right there. https://www.t-mobile.com/offers/free-music-streaming https://www.t-mobile.com/offers/free-music-streaming
- skynet-9000 6y agoPoint taken. I've seen them do that for Youtube as well -- basically, they don't include Youtube vids in your data plan if you are ok with them degrading the video experience (and you can disable that sort of "feature"). However, this doesn't seem very compelling -- some of the things cable modem providers have done (DPI, injecting SYN or RST's into traffic) can end up far worse, but customers only put up with nonsense like that for so long (unless it's a de facto monopoly in that area).