What bothers me about this article is that it tries to present a logical argument that tech monopolies are a problem, wrapped in a political rhetoric about how

What bothers me about this article is that it tries to present a logical argument that tech monopolies are a problem, wrapped in a political rhetoric about how liberals are authoritarian. It starts off as an interesting perspective but ends up as inflammatory whataboutism that doesn't engage deeply with the issue. This is a really interesting moment in history to think about censorship, platforms, speech, and monopoly. We can do a lot better than this article.