3 ms·
yes, but then you don't get covered under section 230, because you are actively making judgement calls, and therefore, should be liable for those.
by foolinaround 6y ago
yes, but then you don't get covered under section 230, because you are actively making judgement calls, and therefore, should be liable for those.
- tstrimple 6y agoThat's really not how Section 230 works. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20200531/23325444617/hello-youve-been-referred-here-because-youre-wrong-about-section-230-communications-decency-act.shtml https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20200531/23325444617/hello...
- foolinaround 6y agothis link clarified some things for me,thanks
- chc 6y agoWhatever news source you heard talking about section 230, you should stop trusting it, because they are actively misinforming you.