5 ms·
are you even reading yourself right? >and to redistribute copies with or without changes. you are saying free to redistribute copies with or without change bu
by 2Gkashmiri 6y ago
are you even reading yourself right?
>and to redistribute copies with or without changes.
you are saying free to redistribute copies with or without change but you are saying connecting to official server is bad for brand. what happened to copies without change? how can you justify that? arent you restricting that line?
if moxie is so worried about the sugarflake brand, why does it not copyright the brand name? shouldnt that solve their problems? why pretend open source when its not
- aidenn0 6y ago> you are saying free to redistribute copies with or without change but you are saying connecting to official server is bad for brand. what happened to copies without change? how can you justify that? arent you restricting that line? Nobody is stopping you from distributing copies without change. Do it right now. Announce it to the world. It's 100% fine. > if moxie is so worried about the sugarflake brand, why does it not copyright the brand name? shouldnt that solve their problems? why pretend open source when its not Signal is actually trademarked. Scroll to the bottom of the signal website: and you will see "Signal is a registered trademark in the United States and other countries." Nothing new about this. Firefox is trademarked as well (hence e.g. iceweasel) I'm sure the author of openssh runs an ssh server somewhere. He doesn't let me connect to it. That doesn't make ssh less open-source.