4 ms·
https://twitter.com/adbusters/status/1288193793267625984 https://twitter.com/adbusters/status/1288193793267625984 is still up "On September 17, 2020 we will la
by kofejnik 6y ago
https://twitter.com/adbusters/status/1288193793267625984 https://twitter.com/adbusters/status/1288193793267625984 is still up
"On September 17, 2020 we will lay siege to The @WhiteHouse
for exactly fifty days.
We need your wisdom and expertise to pull off a radically democratic toneshift in our politics.
Are you ready for #revolution?
This is the #WhiteHouseSiege"
1k retweets
- johnmaguire2013 6y agohttps://twitter.com/Adbusters/status/1289363787879915522 https://twitter.com/Adbusters/status/1289363787879915522 Doesn't seem they were advocating for violence.
- lwheelock 6y ago> Fifty days — September 17th to November 3rd. > > Let us once again summon the sweet, revolutionary nonviolence that was our calling card in Zuccotti Park. If your stated intent explicitly calls for ‘non-violence’, I expect this doesn’t violate ToS despite potential inferences from the sensational branding. I never heard of this before so I don’t even know what happened on Sept. 17. Was it violent?
- weaksauce 6y agobecause they didn't call for a violent overthrow of the government but a peaceful jazz fest like they had 9 years prior. they are calling for an occupy wallstreet 2.0 https://www.adbusters.org/campaigns/whitehousesiege-tactical-briefing-1 https://www.adbusters.org/campaigns/whitehousesiege-tactical... the stuff that parler was leaving up was outright sedition and calls for violence.