>it's turtles all the way down so you can see how people might disagree with you on whether someone is independent/reliable/etc. >a) isn't possible. Sure it

>it's turtles all the way down so you can see how people might disagree with you on whether someone is independent/reliable/etc. >a) isn't possible. Sure it is. "You deplatform someone after court order", or "you deplatform someone after measuring public opinion".These algorithms are just illustrative, before someone starts to point out why they're bad. I just want objectivity and symmetry. Because I've seen far too many people do mental gymnastics and apply double standards when it comes to "our side" and "their side". >b) is absolutely not desirable. it is desirable for me. When it comes to politics, I'd prefer if everyone had a voice, even if you or I disagreed with them on a fundamental level.